Saturday, December 8, 2007

The “Reasonable Accommodation” Commission and Debate: Statement by No One Is Illegal-Montreal

i recommend people to read the below statement responding to the "reasonable accomadation" (which is no more than the renaming racism with a funky academic title) debate happening in Quebec right now, it is a brilliant statement that highlights Indigenous struggles for self-determination, immigrant rights, and is unveils racist discourse and manifestations.

- kat the anti-blogger

[The No One Is Illegal-Montreal collective is publishing and distributing the following statement in opposition to the racist “reasonable accommodation” debate in Quebec, and the related Bouchard-Taylor Commission. We encourage groups and individuals who agree with this statement to endorse it by contacting noii-montreal@resist.ca. We also encourage allies who would like to help organize against the hearings, or support the organizing of No One Is Illegal, to get in touch as well.]


November 12, 2007

The “reasonable accommodation” debate in Quebec, and the related “Consultation Commission on Accommodation Practices Related to Cultural Differences” (the so-called “Bouchard-Taylor Commission”), are fundamentally rooted in xenophobia, racism and sexism.

From the outset, the “debate” fails to recognize that Quebec and Canada are built on stolen Indigenous land, and constituted through the dispossession and genocide of Indigenous peoples who have been forced into “accommodating” colonization. Moreover, it completely ignores the fact that racism and white supremacy were intrinsically tied to the creation of both Canada and Quebec, and throughout their histories, have been instrumental in defining who “belongs” and who does not.

The Bouchard-Taylor Commission was created in the context of xenophobia during an election campaign and has provided an uncontested platform for racism, Islamophobia and anti-Semitism.

Opportunistic politicians and corporate media have appealed to public fears and prejudices, and manipulated false controversies over religious practices and cultural differences to create a generalized hysteria, with little to no basis in fact. In its very framework it creates a binary of ‘us’ vs. ‘them’; the ‘us’ being made up of white people of European descent, and the ‘them’ being whichever non-white immigrant group is currently under the spotlight.

The supposed "debate" has made open bigotry publicly acceptable, using simplistic caricatures that render our communities homogenous, uncontested and monolithic. While we reject this offensive portrayal of our communities, we assert the diversity of our cultures and traditions as well as our multiple identities.

Insidiously, so-called progressives and feminists have used the Commission platform to promote their own sophisticated brand of racism, one that refuses to acknowledge the oppressions within Western society, and unquestioningly considers Quebec to be “pluralistic, democratic and egalitarian”.

While using rhetoric rooted in Islamophobia and sexism to justify war abroad, as is the case in the on-going military occupation of Afghanistan, Quebec has embraced the framework around the “rights of women” and the systematic dehumanization of Muslim cultures to justify intolerance chez nous. We reject the notion that women of faith need to be saved from their inherently oppressive and backward cultures, and instead we support the women who are on the frontlines of their own struggles for liberation, and subjects, not objects or victims, of their own transformation.

As the Bouchard-Taylor Commission begins its public hearings in Montreal, we are organizing to openly and publicly reject the commission process and framework. To engage the Commission process is to validate its fundamentally racist premise, which is to stand judgment of immigrant communities. This Commission, sanctioned by the state, is a process of submission, whereby minority populations are forced to justify their very existence in Quebec. The way this debate is framed ignores all the current intolerance and injustice faced by many migrant communities in Quebec, while forcing them to defend themselves as “good Quebecois”.

We declare: Ni patrie, ni état; ni Québec, ni Canada! We refuse to submit to any form of nationalism.

Instead, we organize by uncompromisingly putting forward a vision of social justice, rooted in day-to-day grassroots struggles. We acknowledge and support the self-determination and sovereignty of Indigenous peoples all over the Americas -- struggles that have once again been rendered invisible in the skewed “reasonable accommodation” debate.

We organize actively against poverty, precarity, racial profiling, police brutality, war, capitalism and gender oppression. We organize against borders, for free movement and status for all. We actively fight against state oppression and violence targeted at the most marginalized, while struggling against all forms of oppression, whatever their source.

In contrast to the faulty framework of “reasonable accommodation”, we assert “solidarity across borders”, in the spirit of mutual aid and support.

We call for a collective rejection of the entire Commission. The process of genuine dialogue and debate, and real pluralism, comes from our shared struggles against all forms of oppression. The “reasonable accommodation” debate has clouded and confused the unity and solidarity we share -- as workers, poor, women, queer and trans people, migrants, and others -- fighting together to achieve real justice.

We re-assert those struggles, by refusing the fundamentally racist and sexist premises of the Bouchard-Taylor Commission, and by refusing to be submissive or fearful as we continue to practice self-determination and strive for collective liberation.

-- No One Is Illegal-Montreal (November 2007)
noii-montreal@resist.ca - 514-848-7583
http://nooneisillegal-montreal.blogspot.com


Read more!

Deschooling Society

A link to the full text of Illich's "Deschooling Society"



Carolyn


Read more!

Ivan Illich

Chris posted "Ivan Illich" in response to the 'helping' challenge of our matrix. Illich has written loads of critiques of Institutionalized education and medicine but I wanted, just quickly, to post something positive and practical that he writes:

The operation of a peer-matching network would be simple. The user would identify himself by name and address and describe the activity for which he sought a peer. A computer would send him back the names and addresses of all those who had inserted the same description. It is amazing that such a simple utility has never been used on a broad scale for publicly valued activity.
—Ivan Illich

This is currently being done in a number of areas such as organic farming and strawbale building etc. Imagine if such a centralized apprenticeship network existed? Imagine, also, if such apprenticeship were valued for its real educational value? How might this be seen as popular education?

Carolyn


Read more!

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

One-room schoolhouse part of Prussian model?


This is the Knowlesville one-room schoolhouse in the 1950s...


Read more!

Monday, December 3, 2007

Sanford Kwinter

here is a little something to have a look at . Sanford Kwinter is his name. I'm not sure what I think about it yet, it might drive me crazy, but it could also be brilliant. it is worth having a look. the site is like a choose your own adventure book. He studied with Foucault and Derrida back in the day but now does more work in urbanism and the city.
http://culturemachine.tees.ac.uk/Cmach/Backissues/j002/Articles/art_kolb/Kwinter_s_Essay_989.html

scott


Read more!

Sunday, December 2, 2007

poetic procrastination

So, as i was reading through this little blog of ours (as an informative means of procrastinating on the larger body of work that still needs to be accomplished over the next week), I realized that i had not yest posted the poem that i read in the combined class a few weeks ago in response to Robin Cavanaugh. I can not take credit for these words, as they stem from a group brainstorming process, and individual word associations. I am merely a conduit for collective brilliance of my cohort.


do not buy in to the fallacy
of objective history, for those
who see the invisible
can do the impossible.

perceptions
of other reflected back to
self.
illuminating boundaries of individualization
destroy to
create and elevate
growing
up
up
up
out of the
earth
roots to soil
soil to trunk
branches, reaching up
possible parameters of probability
spaces to spin spontaneity
and freedom dreams

wedging open the door
stuck my foot in
sunlight is streaming
into the room
pushing and pulling
in a power-play

respiring, expiring
inspiring our dreams
what we could be
potential

free from the power of
others and liberated with
the power of the self.
are we asleep or
awake and while we
create in our minds
what are we
destroying?
populate the landscape of
our minds with love and
vision.
do not buy in to the fallacy
of objective history


I hope you all are doing fine on this rainly, white night.
bright blessings
karen


Read more!

On the subject of taxes...

In an earlier discussion, we were discussing taxation as a way of making corporate influence more democratic or, at least, obfuscating it. Chris mentioned the unjustness of the tax system.... recently, I came across this:

TORONTO – More than a decade’s worth of tax cuts have disproportionately lined the pockets of Canada’s most affluent families, says a new tax study by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA). The study finds the top 1 percent of families in 2005 paid a lower total tax rate than the bottom 10 percent of families. “Canada’s tax system now fails a basic test of fairness,” says Marc Lee, senior economist with the CCPA’s B.C. office and author of the study. “Tax cuts have contributed to a slow and steady shift to a less progressive tax system in Canada.” The study, which is the first comprehensive review of tax changes at all levels of government in Canada within the past 15 years, finds the system is delivering larger tax savings for high income families. This reinforces the growing gap in market incomes between high income families and the rest of Canadians. “Most Canadians will be surprised by these findings because they believe we have a progressive tax system – but looking at all taxes combined, that’s no longer the case.” The study, Eroding Tax Fairness: Tax Incidence in Canada, 1990 to 2005, is available at www.growinggap.ca and www.policyalternatives.ca. Its key findings include: Provincial tax cuts are the key culprit for the increasingly regressive nature of Canada’s tax system but the problem has been exacerbated at the federal level with billions of dollars worth of post-2000 tax cuts. The richest one percent of taxpayers saw their tax rate drop by four percentage points between 1990 and 2005. Most Canadians saw their tax rate fall by two percentage points of income, but not so for the poorest 20 percent of taxpayers, who pay three to five percentage points more in taxes. Middle-income families pay about six percentage points more in total taxes than a family in the top 1 percent. -- Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives 410-75 Albert Street, Ottawa, ON K1P 5E7 tel: 613-563-1341 fax: 613-233-1458 http://www.policyalternatives.ca caw567


Read more!